Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by johnglasgow 5710 days ago
The users are not at fault here. Even a SSH or VPN will leave them vulnerable to attacks. Companies (Facebook, Twitter, etc.) have to increase their own security, because they are the only ones that can fix this problem.
2 comments

Sending your HTTP through an SSH tunnel or a VPN will protect against the stranger-at-Starbucks attack.
But not against the stalker-techie-at-your-ISP attack.
Sure, but there are about a million times as many people able and motivated to do the wifi-neighbor attack than the stalker-ISP-gnome attack. And as people with true identities in a stable position of authority at as service provider, the gnomes are easier to find and hold accountable.

This difference -- from random anonymous stranger whose only invested in software, to physical infrastructure with paid staff -- is also one reason bank phishing attacks happen via websites and not actual storefronts made to look like real banks.

If the only threat to Twitter and Facebook users was ISP-gnomes, the websites could put off fixing the issue for another decade.

I absolutely agree on fault. My initial recommendation was for them to refrain from using Facebook at Starbucks until that happens -- regardless of fault, users are the ones that are vulnerable.