Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by gjreda 2769 days ago
Does this change when the two options are perfect substitutes?

As a rider, there's no "cost" to having both apps, so I'll just check both.

Similarly, as a driver, I'll just sit with both apps open and see which one I get a rider on.

3 comments

> As a rider, there's no "cost" to having both apps, so I'll just check both

Sure, if you never left your country. I certainly didn’t want to register to Italy’s official taxi app - don’t wanna trust them my CC nor my life to horrible service I’ve received (same price as Uber, horrible car)

Sure. If a competitor has managed to get good consumer market share, then switching is easy. The marketplaces are not exclusive.

If, for example, HomeAway got a similar number of rentals to Airbnb (though in this particular case, it hasn't), then both markets could easily co-exist.

Creating C2C marketplaces, however, is not an easy task.

Makes you wonder why no one has built an app that interfaces with all of them, and finds you the cheapest rate, while taking a kickback.
> Makes you wonder why no one has built an app that interfaces with all of them, and finds you the cheapest rate, while taking a kickback.

They did (well, it at least has multiple Uber and Lyft services, and I don't know that they get a kickback); the app is called “Google Maps”.

Uber forbids price comparison in their TOS and actively threaten to shut down price comparison sites that use their API: https://www.wired.com/story/uber-and-lyfts-never-ending-ques...

I guess the plan for Uber was always to use low prices to win the market and jack them back up later. Price comparison would interfere with this plan.

Did they make a buddy deal for Google Maps then?
Such API’s should be mandated by government - after all road surface is limited resource hence its a natural monopoly.
Saw a web app that did this a few years ago. Likely the companies made changes to their API’s. Would love to see it again though.