[canhascodez]

No, anarchy is not a solution to over-regulation. If it were, then we would not have regulations. Markets are not a solution for all problems: market failures are quite real, and no, they are not all caused by government.

[twblalock]

> Markets are not a solution for all problems: market failures are quite real, and no, they are not all caused by government.

This particular market failure is definitely caused by government.

[canhascodez]

Homelessness never existed before government regulations?

[dredmorbius]

Not answering your question directly, but the homeless crisis in the US seems to have hit the radar in the early 1980s.

Part of that may be changing terminology -- earlier use of "homeless" tends to focus on "people made homeless" (or "... left ...") after some calamity: structure fire, flood, hurricane, etc. In the 1980s "homeless" became a chronic condition. Other terms may have existed for the long-term unhoused. I'm not aware of them.

What specifically changed, I'm not certain, though circumstances leading to the role of real estate as an asset rather than a utility may be part of that.

https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph?content=homeless%2C%20...

[twblalock]

> Homelessness never existed before government regulations?

The context of the parent comment is high real estate prices in San Francisco, which are caused by government regulations.

[canhascodez]

They're arguing for the removal of regulations in a general sense, not just specific problematic regulations. The solution being proposed is incorrect, regardless of whether the problem has been correctly identified.