I used to pay for GSuite and still found my content being mined. With all due respect to Google, I find it hard to believe that they're as consistent as they believe with filtering paid vs free accounts across the service.
I could be, and am open to being, wrong, though. I'm not Google. Just found myself with substantially less targeted advertising once I left.
And actually that's slightly interesting - how does one determine a bug re: being the recipient of targeted ads when you shouldn't be? Probably wording it wrong without coffee in me, but I hadn't thought of it like that.
turc1656 (other direct reply to you) noted what I was getting at, but to expand on it...
I'm pretty careful about what I share with various services. Facebook (Instagram, etc) are all silo'd off to separate access points, phone is devoid of any of them, you get the gist. The only thing I didn't mind was Google, since I was paying for it, and it's easy to think that paying for it means it'll work how you expect it to and your privacy is intact.
Thus I'd keep Google apps signed in to the account, and I'd keep a tab open with Gmail all day, so short of incognito tabs, I was almost always signed into it.
Your _email_ isn't scanned, but Google doesn't even do that for free email accounts since..., what, 2014? Most people who decry the whole Gmail reading emails angle don't seem to understand this. They still track you as you move around for advertising purposes, though, and that was enough to make me just not want a Google account.
Siloing social media probably reduced my targeted advertising by 20%, and the absolute biggest reduction I found in my life was by getting rid of Google. It's honestly jaw dropping how much tailored content you get shoved at you that "waking up" from it can blow your mind (read: less depression, fomo, and so on, which more people seem to be catching on to).
YMMV though. I don't hate advertising and think it certainly has a place in society, and some people find it useful/fine/acceptable. Just noting my experiences.
> They still track you as you move around for advertising purposes, though, and that was enough to make me just not want a Google account.
Firefox containers solved[1] this for me. They are probably the biggest privacy boost I've felt for a decade. I've got three separate Google containers (private Google account and general Google properties like youtube, and two separate Gsuite accounts), individual Facebook, Reddit and HN containers, a separate containers for various banks I interact with, another separate for online purchases (plus goodreads, because I don't want Amazon to leak), and an individual Pandora one (because why not?).
1: Well, "solved" in that it's harder for them. They can still track me, but at least now they get conflicting cookies from different types of sites but the same IP which might confuse their metrics some. I'm aware I'm probably just making it harder to state anything about me with too much confidence at most.
Yes, but Firefox on Mac is honestly nowhere near the level of polish that other browsers are, so I only use it for social media. My default browser is Safari, which never sees a Google signin anymore. shrug
Besides what the parent already mentioned, I was also a paying GSuite user for some years (when it was still called Google Apps for Applications/Business). And I had e-mail contacts (Google Mail is covered by GApps) appear as suggested profiles, etc. in Google+ (then not covered by GApps).
Even if there is no malice, it seems that they are not enforcing strict boundaries between their products.
> And I had e-mail contacts (Google Mail is covered by GApps) appear as suggested profiles, etc. in Google+ (then not covered by GApps).
It's still a Google service tied to your account, gsuite or not. It doesn't surprise me one bit that there's still a bit of integration there. They already have your email and the emails of others in your address book that you willingly gave them. It's not like they're mining you to steal those and give you creepy suggestions.
> G Suite customers own their data, not Google. The data that G Suite organizations and users put into our systems is theirs, and we do not scan it for advertisements nor sell it to third parties. We offer our customers a detailed data processing amendment that describes our commitment to protecting customer data. Furthermore, if customers delete their data, we commit to deleting it from our systems within 180 days. Finally, we provide tools that make it easy for customer administrators to take their data with them if they choose to stop using our services, without penalty or additional cost imposed by Google
>No advertising in G Suite
There is no advertising in the G Suite Core Services, and we have no plans to change this in the future. Google does not collect, scan or
use data in G Suite Core Services for advertising purposes. Customer administrators can restrict access to Non-Core Services from the Google Admin console. Google indexes customer data to provide beneficial services, such as spam filtering, virus detection, spellcheck and the
ability to search for emails and files within an individual account.
The specificity of "for advertising purposes" leaves wide open the likelihood that it is scanned for "their own purposes", per the question that was asked.
Or for the purposes of, “spam filtering, virus detection, spellcheck and the ability to search for emails and files…”, which seems reasonable and fair.
In my (non-expert) opinion, one of the most important parts of the linked DPA is where Google claims that they are a Processor and not a Controller under GDPR.
A Controller has discretion of what processing takes place and how it is used. A Controller also has greater responsibilities under GDPR to both the data subject and to the authorities. If Google wants to limit their exposure to GDPR (and I see every indication that this is their current strategy), then they need to make sure they only carry out the processing activities outlined in the DPA.
I could be, and am open to being, wrong, though. I'm not Google. Just found myself with substantially less targeted advertising once I left.
And actually that's slightly interesting - how does one determine a bug re: being the recipient of targeted ads when you shouldn't be? Probably wording it wrong without coffee in me, but I hadn't thought of it like that.