|
|
|
|
|
by makomk
2776 days ago
|
|
In theory host countries can require you to prove sufficient resources to support yourself, including health insurance. The problem is that this only really works for countries whose healthcare is structured as insurance in the first place, like the continental European states do; no-one has figured out a sensible way to apply this to the UK's single-payer, free at the point of use healthcare. Non-EEA nationals who are here long term just pay a surcharge for the right to use the NHS, but that's not allowed by the EU rules. In fact, the European Commission's position is that since the NHS is free, this rule should be interpreted as allowing everyone who comes here from other EU states to use it for free even if they're not working and not paying into the NHS, and that this should fulfil the insurance requirement. There was a bunch of press controversy over the UK enforcing the rule as written in some cases a year or so back too. |
|
Moreover the migrant worker has to pay tax in the country they're living in, so tax statement may be good enough.
Most of EU has "single payer, free at point of use" healthcare rather than US model of insurance.
And if they're not working, they can be elected after three months. Is three months slip enough to even put a dent in NHS budget? I'd say not at all. It's not like people are migrating to UK to get temporarily better healthcare. (It sucks compared to almost every other EU country.)
Additionally, for temporary stays, UK can probably demand reimbursement from the member country of origin.