|
|
|
|
|
|
by chrisseaton
2776 days ago
|
|
|
I thought that 'subject to 7.2' meant that they can use the escape-hatch there 'substantial economic or material technical burden'? They can list anything under that. I don't think it's wrong - they can deprecate any service they want to do whenever they want, unless people have paid for and signed a contract that says otherwise which I guess people aren't doing. But the policy doesn't really guarantee anything at all does it, due to the reference escape-hatches? It might as well not exist? |
|
|