[coldtea]

>"fraud product" - Do you mean the product that has been FDA approved for 6 years? Is the FDA "in" on the fraud?

No, but something can be both FDA approved and fraud, e.g. snake oil. It just can't be particularly dangerous.

>Why do you care so strongly about this?

Wasn't you who devoted 4-5 arguments to a single comment the parent made? Why add this pop-psychology facile dismissal? What does "care so strongly" even means as an argument?

[devonEnlis]

Trying to understand the commenter's motivations. This product has reduced cardiovascular death - if his fraud conspiracy theory convinces appropriate patients not to take it, it could literally kill people.

[coldtea]

First time hearing about the product, but looking at the facts, the parent seems to be right. It's more snakeoil than product. Your argument was that FDA approved it, but here's the actual story:

"On 10/16/2013 after FDA's ADCOM panel had voted 9-2 against recommending to expand Vascepa's label for treatment of cardiovascular disease, shares dropped over 60%"

"In March 2016, after losing a court case, the FDA agreed to allow some off-label marketing"

So, it's not like FDA approved it as a drug for cardiovascular disease. They overwhelmingly rejected it as so, and then were forced to allow it to market it self off-label as such (for "free speech" purposes, as opposed for medical reality).