[darawk]

> There's been enough evidence presented so far that I believe it's now on you to demonstrate that it's false, if you can.

Zero evidence has been presented that the CIA targeted civilians intentionally. All you'd have to do to prove me wrong is link it, if it's already here.

> Maybe this has worked for you before, demanding indisputable evidence for every fiddly detail, hoping that your opponent takes the bait and gets bogged down in minutiae?

Maybe this has worked for you before? Where you insist evidence has been supplied elsewhere without ever providing any of your own?