|
|
|
|
|
by mikro2nd
2774 days ago
|
|
Not a materials improvement, but an improvement in the shape of the bowl, so mostly a direct result of better hydrodynamic and CAD modeling. Not only do they use less water, but they /smell better/ -- most of the "smell of urine" results from the pee being added to, and reacting with, water, so no water, no noticeable odour. |
|
Seems that it could be retrofitted easily by replacing the trap if the materials aren't important.
I wonder if patent expiration is responsible for the apparent increase in use of similar systems.
Thanks for your correction.
https://www.waterless.com/how-do-waterless-urinals-work/