|
|
|
|
|
by points
5712 days ago
|
|
FWIW, I disagree. When MS announced support for facebook on the xBox, I thought "hmm why not just give users a browser".
Then they announced twitter integration... "Umm how about just stuff a browser on there". It's farcical. But OTOH, it fits right with MS's plan - they detest the www. It's open. It's free. It's not a walled garden they can monetize. Last time I heard the web division at MS still makes a huge loss. Which leads me to believe they're not in it to make money. They're in it to mess it up, stifle progress, and keep people buying their installable software. They did an absolutely fantastic job of that for 5 years or so. |
|
One has to navigating the web with a joystick (have you tried it? It's fifth circle of hell terrible), the other has you suffering from cramps in 10 minutes flat.
If you've used the browsers, you know just astronomically bad those ideas are. A browser doesn't not belong on a joystick-driven device, it's slow to use and frustrating as hell. So why would MS put a browser on the Xbox?
And how exactly would a browser on the Xbox decrease their lock-in?