|
|
|
|
|
by dm8
2783 days ago
|
|
More tangential q. I always wonder - why Epic is not disrupted yet? In same vein similar Q can be asked, why Bloomberg is not disrupted yet? I guess software is inherently monopolistic (or oligopolistic) market especially in highly regulated markets (healthcare, finance etc.). So going back to earlier question -- why can't someone start an open source alternative? And may be sell it something along the lines of Redhat business model. It looks like support (training, maintenance) costs are way more in healthcare. Why can't be Epic disrupted? P.S. One of my physicians uses Epic, and he is pretty old guy. And once he showed me the interface, my first reaction, "oh god, that software is designed by committee". I really sympathize with doctors who have to work several hours everyday to work on Epic. |
|
This allows IT teams at hospitals to have say and power over best practices but also requires massive investments in custom software and consulting and training.
Add in they've been doing it with patchwork for so many years and it's difficult and there's little incentive to build a new system. When consulting revenue for implementation outpaces licensing... You're going to have a bad time.