[h1d]

Off topic but I wonder why people, especially usually privacy sensitive HN readers use Gmail and turn themselves into Google's better product with nothing to gain?

Running your own server or use a more privacy catered provider with Thunderbird or whatever client isn't so hard.

[Tracist]

Nothing to gain? How about time? That's the common benefit of every *AAS product, both free and paid.

I could self host my own email server, cloud storage and backup solution, calendar software, facebook-alternative node, blog.

Or I could use gmail, GDrive, google calendar, facebook and wordpress.

Yes, I can do everything myself, but now I'm spending my time maintaining each of those different self hosted solutions.

[hnmonkey]

To pile on, gmail is also well-known to have fantastic spam and phishing prevention abilities compared to most other email solutions, something you could literally never do at home yourself without some incredible software that you run yourself (and even then probably not). That's a huge value-add for a ton of users I'd imagine.

'Nothing to gain' is incredibly hyperbolic I think or this person has never read about gmail/used gmail before.

[h1d]

You seem to care more about the one time setup effort than continuously feeding yourself to Google.

Besides, there are providers like Proton if you can't afford to set one up.

[jensv]

Convenience and security are often at odds with one another. Not that Gmail search is any good but you can't search through encrypted mail, as an example.