|
|
|
|
|
by rendall
2788 days ago
|
|
I suspect this conflates two semantically distinct kinds of 'belief': 'I hold the value that fairness is more important than freedom' is not equivalent to 'I know certain facts to be true.' The scientific method is one example of a principled approach to needing evidence for everything: there is no belief, there are only theories that best explain observed phenomena. Ideally, these should be shed like socks when a better model comes along. |
|
Further, isn't even the scientific method at its core also based on certain beliefs about the world for which there is no empirical basis? Not that that would make it any less valuable as a tool for understanding the world.