|
|
|
|
|
|
by dragonwriter
2779 days ago
|
|
|
> Not it is not. It explicitly is not. Yes, it is. The idea of the authors (and those ratifying the amendment) that a moral right to freedom of speech exists independently may be (all or part of) the reason the Constitution expressly provides and protects the legal right to freedom of speech, by the legal right is provided by the Constitution. |
|
|