|
|
|
|
|
by jkaplowitz
2787 days ago
|
|
You're right about the general pattern in the US, but that isn't the explanation in this case. She made sure there were plenty of technical managers under her (she was a VP). The problems that really needed fixing were organizational, not technical, and she did something that a manager with a more technical skew of skills might not have known how to. The managers in that company who tended to be good and well liked didn't have a big ego regardless of gender, even if (as in her case) she was appropriately aware and confident of the areas in which she was strong. |
|