|
|
|
|
|
|
by chug
2789 days ago
|
|
|
This implies women aren't capable of earning success in any way other than trading sexual favors. Also, there's a huge difference in hookup culture and casual flings vs being in a predatory relationship with a huge power imbalance. The "ghosting" and filming comments are very odd by the way. Do you mean women are always ghosted after sex? And that men are worried random Tinder hookups are going to record them? This whole thing reads like women are evil, scheming, worthless manipulators eager to use sex against men and that high powered man pressuring them into sex is somehow a favor since it gives them an opportunity to play out those schemes. |
|
|
No i never implied this. If there is shortcut to top vs 5 additional years of efforts and access to elite club. What do you choose?
>The "ghosting" and filming comments are very odd by the way. Do you mean women are always ghosted after sex?
You misunderstood my point.
If someone refuses to trade sexual favours, they often face retaliation and are ghosted (their presence/efforts are not acknowledged). They get no rewards for their sincere efforts.
>And that men are worried random Tinder hookups are going to record them?
I am not accusing women of recording them. I am saying that executives don't record victim while having sex. So there is no risk of losing reputation for victim as executive has lot more reputation to lose.
No i am painting no one as manipulator. I am explaining the reward/risk dynamics of sexual harassment.