|
|
|
|
|
by swang
2796 days ago
|
|
didn't you just condemn the accuser yourself by assuming she is lying without a jury of her peers to reach a verdict?! /s what you are advocating for here is a nanny state where every time there is an indiscretion a person is innocent until the full power of an international court comes in to deem a person guilty. you don't like the way society is going with this, yet your argument is that we need a trial to convict something in the public opinion. instead of advocating for one extreme to fight another extreme why not just use your own reasoning to determine which person you believe. google found the accusation credible, yet did nothing for the _victim_ other than tell them to keep quiet. is that also justice to you? and you think google actually wants some kind of trial on this? if they did they would be referring these matters to the local authorities. but instead it's just covered up, it's been "handled" don't worry though since it seems like no one actually gets punished for this kinda stuff other than a public shaming. |
|