|
|
|
|
|
|
by sytse
2793 days ago
|
|
|
You can license your project however you want. People are upset because the contributed to these modules assuming they would stay open source, accepted a CLA, and how they are relicensed as closed source. By the way, this is the situation that a DCO addresses https://about.gitlab.com/2017/11/01/gitlab-switches-to-dco-l... Apache 2.0 with restrictions would have already been much clearer than + Common Clause since it prevents confusion with Creative Commons and Apache Commons. It would have been better still to just call it the Redis license since the restrictions fundamentally alter the license. Many projects using Apache 2.0 software like Debian can't accept the new license. |
|
|