[T2_t2]

I think the foolish view is that there is an option that ISN'T evil, and Google chose the wrong one.

So think that one through. Rubin was accused of whatever, and Google owes him money. Which is NOT evil:

A. Not pay any money to Rubin - despite legally owing him some - because the mob has decided that is best?

B. Pay the full amount he is owed to get rid of him?

C. Negotiate a reduced amount, as he is indeed owed money?

C. Take this to court, and make all parties go through all the hassle, be forced to keep Rubin, what, employed but suspended? and then hope that by some miracle you get the outcome you desire?

Again, I think the foolish view is that there is an option that ISN'T evil, and Google chose the wrong one. They are all TERRIBLE options.