|
|
|
|
|
|
by ihtfp07
2800 days ago
|
|
|
I can acknowledge that in retrospect she could have acted differently and avoided this whole situation... But she was mainly the victim. The over reaction by the initial reporter and the authories above them seem a bit wrong but not egregious. The real unforgivable failure is how after the incident the authorities had to double down, never admit any fault, and unfairly paint her as some nefarious perpetrator. Someone is quoted with saying she’s “lucky she ended up in a jail cell and not the morgue”. They propagated the narrative that it was an intentional hoax and bomb scare and mis-used her claim that it was art. (she was saying her shirt was just art, not that the bomb scare was art) The “hoax device” charges brought on her were thrown out. She never was never found to have broken any law. |
|
|
That's not the same as not being callously disrespectful of others' concerns.