[usrusr]

It's a valid concern, but I don't think the line is as muddy as it seems at first glance: would I expect a Pyongyang hotel room to be bugged? No. But I also would not assume that it's not. With this construction you get two kinds of being surprised, with one taking all the variability derived from suspicions and the like while the other should remain quite stable. Just like most people were simultaneously surprised and not surprised at all by the Snowden revelations.

Obviously one would have to explicitly exclude from the "reasonable" test the kind of surprise that was not triggered by Snowden, because otherwise all our greatest fears would become legal by definition.