Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by zekevermillion 2798 days ago
The key diff between a lawyer and a knowledgeable lay person is the nature of the duty owed by each. There is no reason that a normal literate person can't become an expert in a given legal topic, given similar levels of exposure and repetition. But the lawyer has special duties and privileges. One reason that lawyers (and legalistic non-lawyers) have this OCD "not your lawyer / not legal advice" verbal tic is the wish to be clear about when the attorney-client relationship is in play. I don't want anyone to think I owe them that duty.

It's not just a matter of "only lawyers can understand this area". Because, given exposure to the same matters, the same laws, regulators, etc., lay business people can become just as expert in legal analysis. They should still hire an attorney, of course, just as a NBA star still has a coach, the Pope a confessor, etc. etc.
1 comments
riku_iki 2798 days ago
> But the lawyer has special duties

And what are those duties, and how they are enforced?

link
gamblor956 2798 days ago
They are what are known as "fiduciary" duties, and they're enforced by the local state bar association acting on complaints and malpractice lawsuits by aggrieved clients.
link
riku_iki 2798 days ago
So, say I came to lawyer, he gave me wrong advice off the record, because wanted me bring him profit, then charged me $20k for 'legal research' with subsequent heavy litigation, what bar will do?

It is nice that there are bars, but do they make any difference?

link
JamesBarney 2798 days ago
Depending on the advice they could take away his license because a 20k payment fairly obviously creates a client-attorney relationship.
link
riku_iki 2798 days ago
But lawyers almost always give advice off the record, you can't prove anything. In my observations, situation I described is very common.
link
ValentineC 2798 days ago
> But lawyers almost always give advice off the record, you can't prove anything.

If it's of any importance, a lawyer should be more than willing to provide their client with their advice in writing.

This isn't much different from how one shouldn't perform high-stakes transactions without the certainty of a written contract.

link
JamesBarney 2798 days ago
Oh I missed that part of your post, if you're asking do bars punish lawyers when there is no evidence of wrong doing? The answer is it doesn't.

But just saying it's off the record and billing out as legal research instead of practicing law doesn't protect you.

link