| Most think that corruption is the problem when in fact corruption is just a symptom. In social change this is the only one that matters: "(what is profitable)" all other "forces" are bound by this at systemic level. > "(what is considered ethical)" it can only function if you go back to "what is profitable" because if it is not ethical and there is no law to prevent it then it will be done because it is profitable. If it is ethical, and it is not profitable, you can rest assure it will not be pursued not matter how good you feel. Example: Feed the hungry, it is a great ethical idea, but it is seldom profitable so you do not see any company going out of their way to invest in feeding the hungry. > "(what is legal)" this also runs only on what is profitable. If it is not legal, but it is profitable then you can be sure that the laws will soon be changed to accommodate. i.e. Cannabis movement. > "(what is technically possible)" also runs on what is profitable. We can technically do anything we want but is it profitable? Don't be fooled by these articles that find a "novel" way of looking at the problem. It is just noise. If you can't fix the monetary policy in the world, then "what is profitable" will always be what drives any social change |