[reitanqild]

> But it does not make sense to violate personal spaces of millions of people for the possibility that one blind person will be in the train.

What do you mean by "Violate personal spaces"?

> I never encountered a blind commuter but I'm sure they exist.

One reason might be if bo effort wss made to make public transport easy to use for people with disabilities.

[nyc111]

I was referring to @fi358's comment:

> Many of us Finns find it annoying as it is against

> local customs (it resembles situation where somebody

> comes too close to my personal space). This constant

> chit-chat prevents me concentrating on my own thoughts.

> I wouldn't mind if they would talk about some important

> things or keep their chit-chat short, but I don't want

> to be exposed to this kind of noise about trivial

> things for hours.

Like fi358, I consider subjecting someone to unwanted noise to be same as violating their personal space by coming too close to them. To me recorded announcements that repeat and repeat mindlessly the same thing over and over again and serve no purpose is a violation of personal space.

> to make public transport easy to use for people with disabilities...

You are right of course. But someone in wheelchair and a blind person have different requirements. Where I live most busses can accommodate people with wheelchair. People also are extremely helpful to blind people. I see ordinary people helping blinds cross the street. So if a blind person boards a bus all he has to do is to tell his stop to the driver or to a passenger near him.

[reitanqild]

Ok, mostly makes sense to me.

This part however still sticks out IMO:

> Like fi358, I consider subjecting someone to unwanted noise to be same as violating their personal space by coming too close to them.

I'd say there's a fairly huge difference between making noise outside my house (or worse inside my house) and making automatic announcements on a bus.

When traveling in the public we have to live with other people.

[nyc111]

> When traveling in the public we have to live with other people.

I agree. But in the case of the announcements, it's not the other passengers who are making the noise but a huge and mindless bureaucracy who makes the announcements only because it can. The bureaucrats or decision makers do not use public transportation and they don’t have to listen to it everyday. The trains or buses come with the technology to make announcements and managers activate it. Passengers are not asked if they want or need such announcements.

I remember subway in New York in the 80's. They were filthy, covered with graffiti, no air conditioning... but there were no recorded announcements. The conductor would make announcements if he felt like it. There is a huge difference between a live human being making the announcement and a robotic voice repeating the same thing over and over again. I remember getting in those hot and dirty trains and reading my book even if I had to stand up. You can block out human voice easily but not a recorded synthetic announcement.

Also these announcements are useless. They serve no purpose. It's not the train's duty to tell passengers the stop they need to get off. It's the duty of the passenger to know where to get out. It's no big deal if a passenger misses his stop.

But it is a huge deal to me if I cannot read my book during my commute. If I'm in the train 2 hours every day, the bureaucrats are stealing 2 hours of good reading time from me. Why? There is no reason.

Imagine traveling in a quiet train everyday! What a great feeling. I would look forward to such a commute because I can work best in busses and trains.

Sorry for the rant. But to me, these recorded announcements are one of the absurdest things in city living.