|
|
|
|
|
by oblio
2803 days ago
|
|
> I ideologically refuse to consider that every piece of software is a product. 1. Who pays for the hosting? How do they pay for it? 2. Who pays for the site development? How do they pay for it? 3. Who pays for the site content? How do they pay for it? The vast majority of sites out there are commercial products, in some forms or another. Even Wikipedia is, they're periodically begging for money. Since we have this problem that running websites costs money, how are they going to pay for it? The ad model is quite reviled by techies. What's the alternative? How do websites make money to keep running? |
|
Regardless, hosting is a separate issue. You have open source projects who provide a piece of software that you're free to host yourself or pay somebody else to host for you. See for instance the Roundcube webmail.
It's similar to how I need to buy a computer to be able to run Emacs, that doesn't mean that Emacs itself is a product. Of course many web services are actual products and you pay for both the development and the hosting.
Here we're talking about a web browser though so the point is moot anyway.