|
|
|
|
|
by adamb
2803 days ago
|
|
I'm actually just asserting that systems advocating for use of V2V messages should account for misinformation. That is, as a human I know that the drivers around me might have broken lights or misuse their signals. I also assume that other drivers do not have my best interest at heart. A reasonable V2V system should be expected to handle these scenarios just as easily as they handle wireless interference and packet loss. |
|