|
Unless one views combatting unwanted sexual conduct to which people are subjected without consent as an unsavory purposes, no, there isn't. But if one views the efforts towards combating unwanted sexual conduct as a pretext used by certain people who want power as an end, then it becomes an especially unsavory purpose, no? True, but irrelevant, for several reasons: first, this isn't a law enforcement issue The classic strategy of non-governmental authoritarians, since they do not have a monopoly on violence, is to do what they can with the same effect. If you don't have the state monopoly on violence, then dress in uniformed hoods and do violence and vandalism under the cover of anonymous crowds. If you don't have the state function of the judiciary, then use kangaroo courts, "trial in the media," and extralegal means to make accusations with the presumption of guilt. All of the above is very relevant today. third, no one is suggesting equivalency or arguing for ignoring the distinctions between acts within the category while discussing the broad category. False. Exactly that is happening in order to turn the tables on current power structures, and to let one group intimidate another. |