Which is what most national income distributions look like. With the vast majority making below or well below the median income. Hence the fuss about the 1% controlling so much wealth.
> With the vast majority making below or well below the median income.
In any case, it's mathematically definitionally impossible for the vast majority of any population to be making less than the median of that population. (It is possible with respect to the average, of course.)
(Even in the above (degenerate) case, there is no member of the series with less than the median value of $1K.)