Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by smt88 2808 days ago
This is a semantic argument. The outcome depends on how you define "living".

Any definition that includes fire (i.e. hot air) is so broad that it makes the word "living" meaningless and useless. If you included fire, you'd perhaps have to include water or any other fluid.

1 comments

The argument cannot be made for water as it does not respire or digest. Yes, the definition of life that fire fits in is broad. But it is still the definition of life.
I don't know how you define "respire", but water dissolves and releases gases. Fire is a gas, so it can't "respire" the same way. It is just one gas or another.

As for digestion, water is a powerful solvent that breaks many things down. Fire just heats them up, which may or may not change their chemical structure.

Fire takes in Oxygen and gives out CO2. That is respiration. Fire converts fuel into energy. That is digestion.
You do not know what fire is. I'm serious. You should look it up.

For starters, you're confusing combustion with fire.