No, what makes Carmack interesting is his discussions about highly technical topics at a moderately advanced level. There are plenty of people who are more than happy to explain what functional programming is at a basic level for laypersons. Carmack is not that.
I assume you're American because of your need to dumb everything down instead of respecting intellectualism as is.
I assume you're American because of your need to dumb everything down instead of respecting intellectualism as is.