|
|
|
|
|
by thx4allthestuff
2814 days ago
|
|
I didn't downvote you (I don't really downvote, thank you for those who do though), but I think the reason this was voted down is because you didn't provide any substance in your answer, and put a potentially large burden on those who were curious (how much shit will we have to wade through to get to your point). I would suggest giving a brief overview of your point before sending people down a rabbit hole. We just don't have time for that. As a semantic aside, the index call to the single reference was unnecessary, lol. Just trying to help. |
|
For those of you who have other mindless things you would prefer to spend hours on in your life and have no interest outside of wanting a quick fix: ~17,000,000 million disappeared[0] from the numerator since there is a lot of flexibility in ("People are classified as unemployed if they do not have a job, have actively looked for work in the prior 4 weeks, and are currently available for work."). People are fooling themselves if they think the employment rate is relevant signal anymore for determining the strength of the economy, it hasn't been in 10 years.
[0] https://www.alhambrapartners.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/...