Hacker News new | ask | show | jobs
by steveklabnik 2804 days ago
You can call std::mem::drop if you'd like to drop something early. That's the notation you're asking for.

Additionally, part of Rust's core ideas is that the compiler has your back with this kind of thing, so there's less need for comments that say "CAUTION HERE BE DRAGONS." Those things can still be useful for understanding details of your code, of course, but they aren't needed to ensure that things are memory safe. That's what the compiler is for!
1 comments
tveita 2803 days ago
I do use explicit drop() calls in my own code to call attention to drops with side effects, but it does not seem to be common practice.

My preferred semantics would have been early drops by default, and a must_drop annotation similar to must_use, to say that objects like RwLockReadGuard should be explicitly dropped or moved.

link
steveklabnik 2803 days ago
Those semantics would be nice, but they have a lot of unsolved issues: https://gankro.github.io/blah/linear-rust/
link
ehsanu1 2803 days ago
Nice article, but not sure that the changes it talks about are actually required for the suggested semantics. The `must_drop` annotation suggested could just be a lint rather than actually being encoded in the type system. I don't know if early drops is related or possible though.
link