Even with a good health care package, a friend paid $10 thousand dollars (his maximum deductible) for the first year of one of his children, due to infant allergies.
That is not what most people consider a 'good' health care package. That would be considered a 'high deductible' plan.
When people talk about 'good' health care plans in the US they tend to think of traditional low deductible PPO. Those tend to have family deductibles in the $500-1k range.
Though the employee premium differences might add up to more than 10K in the face of a 'good' health care plan so its largely not relevant to the argument about health care costs in a nation vs nation way (though you'd want to include tax burden for health insurance in that case).
There's no real correlation between the "goodness" of an insurance plan and its deductible. In the end all that really matters is the quality of care you receive and how much you have to pay for it.
Many employers offer high deductible plans but also contribute into the employee's HSA which can be used to pay deductibles. In theory that incentivizes the employee to shop around and get the best possible deal on care.
Agreed but in this anecdote what do you think would happen in that case? I’d guess the person would complain about the deductible even though in real terms it might be cheaper than premiums on a low deductible plan.
When people talk about 'good' health care plans in the US they tend to think of traditional low deductible PPO. Those tend to have family deductibles in the $500-1k range.
Though the employee premium differences might add up to more than 10K in the face of a 'good' health care plan so its largely not relevant to the argument about health care costs in a nation vs nation way (though you'd want to include tax burden for health insurance in that case).