| FWIW, I upgraded a 5+ year old MacBook Air to the new MacBook Pro basically because I wanted to. I think the screen was the main driver, but really there was nothing wrong with that Air; as evidenced by the fact that a good friend is now using it as her primary computer. Planned obsolence is another meme that needs to die. Regarding the cost of screens for a phone, what, you wish they were lower? Me too! But they aren’t, if you want an original Apple screen. They cost a bunch to source ($110) [0], they cost a bunch for Apple to train up techs, and to have the systems and procedures and checklists such that every time you get an Apple replacement, it’s like new. Would everyone who dropped their phone wish for a $20 replacement? Of course. Tough luck. I’m not suggesting that non-Apple repair is different, but you have to admit that a knock-off 3rd party screen is probably not going to be as reliable. And who wears the pain and anger when that screen doesn’t work? Apple. You can’t fault them for wanting to control this stuff. If it was my company, I would. [0]: https://www.businessinsider.com.au/iphone-x-teardown-parts-c... |
>You can’t fault them for wanting to control this stuff. If it was my company, I would.
Your example with the screen would be similar to changing say a car part you are forced to go to the manufacturer to get the original part, the fun part is that the windscreen is half the price of a new car so you now start considering buying a new car or gluing your windscreen.
So Apple does not sell parts, forces you to use their repair shops and tax you tons for simple repairs, PLUS they make you pay for their own faults until some class action forces them to admit the hardware faults.
I never seen companies suffer PR impact because someone repaired their old phone/laptop/computer/electronic at a third party.
My points stand for products that are out of warranty, if products are in warranty then the laws apply.