[lima]

You can do stacked diffs on GitHub by always using squash merges and rebasing on top of master, and it's a great way to get started.

It's just a lot nicer with the extra tooling on top that Phabricator and Gerrit provide (dependencies, command line tools, and so on).

[mullsork]

It's true that you can do that indeed. Annoyingly, you have to manually rebase if you want to use the "merge & squash" feature. I don't understand why there's no "merge into one commit, rebase with master, merge onto master" feature. It's tedious to manually keep rebasing branches that were approved for review but have gone behind.

[yxhuvud]

If you squash merge you just lost all the small commits that do one thing well that you spent time creating, unless you review them one by one. Bleh.

[lima]

That's the entire point of a stacked diff workflow - you would submit smaller PRs which are the equivalent of one commit.

[UK-Al05]

My pull request branches are of the size that it only makes sense together.