|
|
|
|
|
by nessus42
2819 days ago
|
|
I guess I am unclear on one of your points: Let's say we toss a fair quantum coin many, many times. In the Everett Interpretation, yes, there is a "world" in which that coin has always come up heads. But our chance of finding ourselves in that world is vanishingly small. In the Bohm Interpretation, that coin could always come up heads too, but again with a vanishingly small probability. So they seem equivalent experimentally to me. (And to the experts who have written entire books on the subject.) Max Tegmark came up with a way to experimentally determine if the Everett Interpretation is correct. (I believe it was Tegmark who came up with this.) It has a high cost for the experimenter, though! What you do, is rig a gun to a fair quantum coin, so when you pull the trigger, the gun fires 50% of the time. Now shoot yourself in the head with it many, many times. If you end up surviving many rounds of this, you can be pretty darn certain that the Everett Interpretation is correct. Never mind the billions of other versions of yourself that you murdered to discover the truth! |
|