I'm not going to play anymore metaphor/semantic games. It's nice that you did that project, but it's not at all necessary for someone to engage in that in order to understand performance issues.
You're the one that raised the metaphor, but okay?
I'm not saying that you can't do performance work without having done that. Just that you'll be at a disadvantage since you're at the mercy of whatever your HW vendor decides to disclose to you.
If you know this stuff you can work back from from first principals. With a high level memory architecture of a system(say tiled vs direct rendering GPU) you can reason about how certain operations will be fast and will be slow.
And your response was absurd. You don't rebuild a transmission in order to run a shop. You don't even rebuild a transmission as an engineer creating cars, you shop that out to an organization specializing in the extremely difficult task of designing and building transmissions. I wanted to avoid this waste of time, but here we are.
As for the rest of your comment about reasoning about performance, none of that requires the work you did. Again, neat project (for you), but completely unnecessary in general.
I'm not saying that you can't do performance work without having done that. Just that you'll be at a disadvantage since you're at the mercy of whatever your HW vendor decides to disclose to you.
If you know this stuff you can work back from from first principals. With a high level memory architecture of a system(say tiled vs direct rendering GPU) you can reason about how certain operations will be fast and will be slow.