|
|
|
|
|
|
by LeanderK
2820 days ago
|
|
|
while I agree there are some real arguments, this is not what I would call a scientific presentation. It starts acceptable, but page 19, 22 are just unnecessary and have a connotation.
Page 24 seems a bit conspiracy-theory-like.
The comic on page 25...that's not scientific. It frames your opponents as angry grown-ups denying young girls the chance to shine in science! I think on the other pages are are also phrases and formulations that don't have a phrase in scientific presentations. CERN is full of smart people and they will find a way to deal with this issue. |
|
|