|
|
|
|
|
by Emma_Goldman
2816 days ago
|
|
I think it would be very wrong to think of increasing house prices as a direct reflection of intrinsic value. In the UK the economic model of the past forty years has been based on a conscious policy of asset price inflation. Thatcher stripped away most of the social housing in this country and put it into the market. Few have been built since. The recentering of the economy in financial services has led to a massive expansion of easy credit, that reaches its fulcrum in the housing market. Together this has meant: (a) a dwindling housing stock; (b) progressively larger sums of credit chasing the same number of properties. That is not to mention the fact the since the late 1960s London has been the main global waystation for offshore tax havens, much of which is attached to property sales in the capital. There are 100,000 properties in the UK which are held as investments, unoccupied. |
|
In a financialised system everything is priced according to the values of the first economy, which are completely divorced from conventional economic utility.
This makes everything unaffordable to those who don't have access to that economy. It also lowers the quality of goods and services within the second economy, because providing quality and value conflicts with fast high returns.