|
|
|
|
|
by groestl
2821 days ago
|
|
I find that distinction very much of interest, and sure enough, RMS also has an explicit text available which deals with that matter more directly [0]. While free software protects the freedoms of the user only, copyleft software protects the freedoms of the developer as well. Both types of software are ethical (as mentioned in [1]), so it comes down to personal choice of the original author, who can use it as a tool to ensure their goals. [0] https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/pragmatic.html [1] https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.en.html |
|