|
|
|
|
|
|
by genericone
2825 days ago
|
|
|
That's interesting, and we'll see what CA gov does and how far the CA politicians think they can go with this. If they mandate simply that Khosla must ALLOW access, how much can/will he charge for that access, lets say something stupidly large like $200? Would he be within his rights to do so? And since it is his property, he should be able to close the parking lots, bathrooms, and general store too, especially if he were to be liable for maintenence, upkeep, accident liability, etc? |
|
|