[badminton1]

Gmail's user base = billions of people.

A few hundred upset users can be misleading.

[felixgallo]

Or, representative.

[badminton1]

This only means many users are upset.

But even if they were 100,000, that would be a small fraction of the user base and you could still say the user base is either indifferent or satisfied with the change.

[Nicksil]

>But even if they were 100,000

That would still be representative. A sample. I don't understand your argument.

[system2]

Simply put, normies count. Not us. Even if 1% (few million users?) are upset now, this wouldn't make google change their mind serving 99% unaware users.

[matthewmacleod]

This is how we get crap everywhere.

“It’s fine, only people who know what they’re talking about eilll realise how slow it is” is a terrible view to have when developing a piece of software!

[Nicksil]

I don't understand. We (at least the folks who are unhappy with this update) are the users of the application. The complaints pertain to issues which affect both "normies" and "us" alike. If I observe an unresponsive/lagging behavior, it isn't because I may be more technically inclined, but because my brain detected an unexpected delay between my input and the outcome.

[_ttg]

A sample but a self-selected, louder sample. I would bet the overwhelming majority of users are indifferent to the change.