[lossolo]

> Can I ask where this impression came from?

Are you serious now? I mean you are very active Rust activist on both HN and Reddit and you exactly know what Rust Evangelic Strike Force is and where it came from. I've seen multiple threads on HN and Reddit where people do exactly what OP wrote. I don't know if it's denial or ignorance on your side or you are writing this with premeditation.

[kibwen]

The "Rust Evangelism Strike Force" is a dumb meme (but I repeat myself) that gets used sarcastically, and was originally coined by people who were themselves critical of Rust. If you have links to instances of people doing exactly as OP wrote, please paste them here; I am mod of /r/rust, where we have had a "No zealotry" rule ("Stay mindful of the fact that different technologies have different goals and exhibit fundamentally different tradeoffs in pursuit of those goals.") since long before cat-v.org concocted the RESF, and I am happy to rein people in if their heads get too big. :)

As to whether my above question is serious, the answer is yes, because truth be told I see more people complaining about Rust Evangelism than I see instances of evangelism in the first place, to the extent that I wonder if that itself has become a meme by now.

[lossolo]

> where we have had a "No zealotry" rule ("Stay mindful of the fact that different technologies have different goals and exhibit fundamentally different tradeoffs in pursuit of those goals.")

I've never wrote anywhere that you encourage that kind of behavior. There is a difference between encouraging and pretending that problem do not exist. Seems that you are just biased and what you are doing here is white washing a community you are part of.

> If you have links to instances of people doing exactly as OP wrote, please paste them here;

I would rather spend time with my family than searching whole HN and Reddit for obvious things that were mentioned here multiple times by multiple people but I've found couple of links fast (not for you, but for other readers) [1][2]. And this are only two examples that I've found fast. Those are examples of things that you surely have read and aware of. Another example is some Animats posts in some C++/Rust debate thread on HN in which he was describing his experience and technical details while criticizing Rust and was downvoted to hell.

Here you have another person writing same thing and dbaupp acknowledging that the problem exist [3].

This comments didn't come from vacuum and denying that problem exist will only make it worse.

[1] https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/5fyhjb/golangs...

[2] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17088181

[3] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=14178950

[kbenson]

It's fairly clear from the context of the comment he was asking about where the impression came from in this thread. I have no doubt he was interesting because he believes it is somewhat unjustified and self perpetuating, but if this thread is any indication, there may be some truth to that.

So, to restate the question clearly and unambiguously, what prior to kibwen's question lends someone to think this is a matter of Rust evangelists taking issue, and not the somewhat common HN interaction of someone calling out someone else for, in their eyes, misinterpreting or ignoring and aspect something and then denigrating it for that lack?

[marcosdumay]

Well, first let me take this out of the way: if plenty of people do what the OP was complaining about, I would welcoming he complaining about them, but not about people that didn't do it.

Now, I'm having problems understand what that Rust Evangelic Strike Force is, and what nefarious goals it could have. Do you have a pointer? (Also, is it a funny group?)

[iopq]

We're the Rust Evangelism Strike Force and we'll convince you to write more secure code!