|
|
|
|
|
by billforsternz
2818 days ago
|
|
I have an irrational attachment to V2.11. For whatever reason, I thought that represented the first mature, finished DOS V2. V2 was massively improved over V1 (V1 didn't have subdirectories), and V3,4,5 etc were much more marginal improvements. For years I kept a version of debug.com from V2.11, patched (with debug.com) so that the initial version check didn't abort for something other than 2.11. It had all the features I expected in debug, yet was positively tiny compared to bloated later versions with no (important) extra features. To me that was V2.11 versus later versions in a nutshell. |
|