[roenxi]

I have no idea what Jones was doing, not being an InfoWars viewer or following the story closely.

But, I feel under no threat of being disconnected by my water provider because /they think/ that I am harassing someone.

For Jones in particular, I believe the appropriate channels of response are for the person being harassed to: (1) Sue him (2) Respond clearly.

The tech majors, who have mounting leaked evidence that their management is politically active in the workplace, should not be arbitrating what a publisher does. If they do, then they are publishers themselves, in which case they should be regulated differently and their status as publishers made very public.

[s73v3r_]

"I have no idea what Jones was doing"

Then it seems very bad faith for you to be using him as an example.

"For Jones in particular, I believe the appropriate channels of response are for the person being harassed to: (1) Sue him (2) Respond clearly."

This is simply not true. Further, if you're Twitter, and you have users that are harassing other users, that makes those users less wanting to use your platform. And you have other people that catch wind that Twitter is doing nothing about harassment, and now very few people want to use Twitter.

"The tech majors, who have mounting leaked evidence that their management is politically active in the workplace"

[Citation Needed]

"If they do, then they are publishers themselves, in which case they should be regulated differently and their status as publishers made very public."

I disagree. Asking someone to leave who is harassing other users is not causing themselves to be publishers.