It's enough of a gray area to make DynamoDB a poor example in this context, since if I were to claim that it was eventually consistent without additional configuration, then an informed person might reasonably assume I didn't know what I was talking about.
It would be better to state that both eventually consistent and fully consistent reads are available, and consistency can be enforced up front via configuration.
It would be better to state that both eventually consistent and fully consistent reads are available, and consistency can be enforced up front via configuration.