|
|
|
|
|
by bopbop
2832 days ago
|
|
>They're just making the point that she didn't marry him for his social credit score, even though he happens to have a high score under the system. Yes, that makes sense. I still hold that the deliberate omission of her party relationship until later in the article is to initially position her as a third party positive voice who happens to support the system. And yes, the network affects are particularly awful. |
|