|
|
|
|
|
|
by doodpants
2834 days ago
|
|
|
If you pause at 3:33 in the video and read the abstract, it actually says that numbers in base 2 require "at most 4 palindromes", rather than exactly 3, and "similar results" were found for bases 3 and 4. So it's not quite the same result as for bases of 5 or greater. |
|
|