|
|
|
|
|
by manquer
2839 days ago
|
|
Would this cover assets not directly owned by him, or assets owned abroad etc ? some loophole which would allow him to retain some chunk of his wealth? While it likely that it is negotiation tactic, it has to believable one for creditors to think he may actually follow through, otherwise there is no point. |
|
As will any primary residence if it has a higher standard or price than the sustenance minimum, any vehicles not required to perform work, any household items beyond a minimum of ~$10k or so in value. It's quite harsh.
If married, the spouse can keep 50% of any assets that were jointly owned.