|
|
|
|
|
by ruds
2828 days ago
|
|
The complaint is about the text in the article, which reads "The hardware interprets a float as having the value: value = (-1)^sign * 2^(exponent-127) * 1.fraction".
"1.fraction" is nonsense that doesn't really mean anything, whereas (1 + fraction * 2^-23) does mean something. |
|